update README w/ MIT info
This commit is contained in:
parent
be931882ef
commit
a463577988
11
README.md
11
README.md
@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
|
||||
stb
|
||||
===
|
||||
|
||||
single-file public domain libraries for C/C++ <a name="stb_libs"></a>
|
||||
single-file public domain (or MIT licensed) libraries for C/C++ <a name="stb_libs"></a>
|
||||
|
||||
Most libraries by stb, except: stb_dxt by Fabian "ryg" Giesen, stb_image_resize
|
||||
by Jorge L. "VinoBS" Rodriguez, and stb_sprintf by Jeff Roberts.
|
||||
@ -45,13 +45,18 @@ These libraries are in the public domain (or the equivalent where that is not
|
||||
possible). You can do anything you want with them. You have no legal obligation
|
||||
to do anything else, although I appreciate attribution.
|
||||
|
||||
They are also licensed under the MIT open source license, if you have lawyers
|
||||
who are unhappy with public domain. Every source file includes an explicit
|
||||
dual-license for you to choose from.
|
||||
|
||||
#### <a name="other_libs"></a> Are there other single-file public-domain/open source libraries with minimal dependencies out there?
|
||||
|
||||
[Yes.](https://github.com/nothings/single_file_libs)
|
||||
|
||||
#### If I wrap an stb library in a new library, does the new library have to be public domain?
|
||||
#### If I wrap an stb library in a new library, does the new library have to be public domain/MIT?
|
||||
|
||||
No.
|
||||
No, because it's public domain you can freely relicense it to whatever license your new
|
||||
library wants to be.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Some of these libraries seem redundant to existing open source libraries. Are they better somehow?
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -8,13 +8,18 @@ These libraries are in the public domain (or the equivalent where that is not
|
||||
possible). You can do anything you want with them. You have no legal obligation
|
||||
to do anything else, although I appreciate attribution.
|
||||
|
||||
They are also licensed under the MIT open source license, if you have lawyers
|
||||
who are unhappy with public domain. Every source file includes an explicit
|
||||
dual-license for you to choose from.
|
||||
|
||||
#### <a name="other_libs"></a> Are there other single-file public-domain/open source libraries with minimal dependencies out there?
|
||||
|
||||
[Yes.](https://github.com/nothings/single_file_libs)
|
||||
|
||||
#### If I wrap an stb library in a new library, does the new library have to be public domain?
|
||||
#### If I wrap an stb library in a new library, does the new library have to be public domain/MIT?
|
||||
|
||||
No.
|
||||
No, because it's public domain you can freely relicense it to whatever license your new
|
||||
library wants to be.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Some of these libraries seem redundant to existing open source libraries. Are they better somehow?
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
|
||||
stb
|
||||
===
|
||||
|
||||
single-file public domain libraries for C/C++ <a name="stb_libs"></a>
|
||||
single-file public domain (or MIT licensed) libraries for C/C++ <a name="stb_libs"></a>
|
||||
|
||||
Most libraries by stb, except: stb_dxt by Fabian "ryg" Giesen, stb_image_resize
|
||||
by Jorge L. "VinoBS" Rodriguez, and stb_sprintf by Jeff Roberts.
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user